More landlords could be forced into court following debt collection changes.

insolvency service targets bounce back loan abusers

Legislative changes coming into force on October 1 will see the current debt threshold at which creditors can serve a statutory demand increase from £750 to £5,000.

This change will force commercial landlords to pursue court judgments and subsequent enforcement action to recover sub £5,000 debts. Commercial landlords are advised to act now to evaluate their options and take appropriate action to reduce the risk of delays, disputes and mounting debtors.

The limited ability to serve a statutory demand is the latest in a series of changes which have depleted landlords’ defensive armoury. The 21 days that debtors have to respond to a statutory demand (either to pay, or reach a payment agreement), or face insolvency is an extremely persuasive tactic to recover monies owed. The absence of this option will negatively affect the speed of debt collection and could reduce overall recovery rates.

This comes as another blow as just last year commercial landlords were removed of the ability to recover arrears through the seizure and sale of goods belonging to the tenant, this was replaced by Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR). Under CRAR guidelines, landlords are required to give 7 days’ notice before entering the premises to seize goods and another 7 days’ notice prior to sale of these items. This has led to a larger administrative burden and more tenant disputes. In addition, CRAR is somewhat restrictive in that it can only be used to recover rent arrears, not other debts such as service charges and insurance premiums.

As a result of these changes, many commercial landlords will have to look to court judgements to force debtors to pay monies owed. However, while necessary in some instances, engagement with the courts is likely to drive up costs. Claims of less than £10,000 will be referred to the small claims court, where the landlord will be liable to pay all costs. In addition to this, the process can be lengthy, a problem exacerbated by Government cuts and a subsequent reduction in investment in the court system.

Where possible, ptenancy agreementreventative action should be taken to reduce the risk of tenants falling into arrears, thus reducing the negative impact of this new legislation. Landlords should aim to complete due diligence checks before the tenant signs the contract with tenant check companies such as TenantSureLandlords may also choose to demand a larger initial deposit to offset any potential arrears. While this may have been an unrealistic option a few years ago, increased demand for commercial premises compared to supply has awarded landlords with greater bargaining power.

In addition to this, rather than landlords agreeing to a traditional quarterly rent payment schedule, it may be possible to revert to the model commonly adopted on mainland Europe whereby payments are made on a monthly basis. In this case, any late payments can be detected and managed quickly minimising the risk of debts mounting. Finally, some of the most important considerations for landlords are the simplest-

Ensuring that references are collected, credit checks are made and where required guarantors are provided, this should hopefully reduce the burden of debt collection.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.